'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for Monday, August 1st, 2011
The Four Great Hypocrisies
via YouTube, h/t cathyferkleheimer
ShowPlug1: Live on Countdown, Satan Sandwich Edition, 8E: @BrianBeutler on latest + report VP said POTUS was ready to use 14th Amendment
ShowPlug2: Plus unexpected arrival of Rep.Gabby Giffords on floor to vote. Guests: CBC head @RepCleaver @Markos Moulitsas on blowback
ShowPlugLast: Special Guest: @AlGore. + My Special Comment: We must take back governing this country: our leaders have forgotten how.
watch whole playlist
House passes debt deal, Brian Beutler
House passes debt deal, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver
House passes debt deal, Markos Moulitsas
Why Washington is broken, Al Gore
Worst Persons: Detroit Tigers and Seattle Mariners, Rep. Michele Bachmann, Glenn Beck
Special Comment: The Four Great Hypocrisies
Countdown's nominees for today's three Worst Persons in the World.
The bronze, shared by the Detroit Tigers and Seattle Mariners baseball trade, who on Saturday completed a player trade.
Detroit sent third baseman Francisco Martinez, outfielder Casper Wells, and pitcher Charlie Furbush to Seattle, for pitchers Doug Fister and David Pauley.
Detroit actually owes Seattle a fourth player, to be identified later. It may be minor league pitcher Chance Ruffin.
So that'd make it the Ruffin-Furbush-Fister Trade?
Our runner-up: Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.
Only she could confess to utter hypocrisy and still convince herself that it's somebody else's fault.
The Washington Post reported that a 417-thousand dollar loan Bachmann got for a 5200-square foot house on a golf course had to have come from either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
The Congresswoman has vowed to shut down the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage programs.
So you'd think maybe she'd deny a charge like that.
You know: exploiting a federal program for her own benefit but then trying to deny it to everybody else.
"Now unlike all of you, who I'm sure pay cash for your homes, there are people out there like myself who actually have to go to a bank and get a mortgage. And this is the problem. It's almost impossible to buy a home in this country today without the federal government being involved. Whether it is with the FHA, whether it's with Fannie, whether it's with Freddie, it's almost impossible to buy a home." "What's important is that we do dismantle a number of these federal programs that everyone agrees are clearly out of control."
Well if they're giving loans to people intent on killing them off, maybe they are out of control.
But not as out-of-control as somebody who could stand there with a straight face and insist that of course they got a mortgage from the government because they needed one, but you can't get a mortgage from the government because she says so.
But our winner: Lonesome Rhodes Beck.
This keeps getting worse and worse.
The comparison between the victims in Norway, and the Hitler Youth.
But listen to the second part of this, more than the Hitler part:
"And as the thing started to unfold and then there was a shooting at a political camp, which sounds a little like the hitler youth or whatever. I mean who does a camp for kids thats all about politics? "...Disturbing."
First we pointed out that "a camp for kids that's all about politics" is still run, to this day, in this country...by the John Birch Society.
Then, it was noted in several quarters that "a camp for kids that's all about politics" is run, this summer, by the Tea Party.
Now, we are apprized, there are 130 Vacation Liberty Schools that their founder Lisa Abler describes as teaching kids the "virtues and morals" of the American founding fathers.
Probably leaving out the ones who owned slaves and stuff.
Anyway, Ms. Abler said that a year ago there was just the one camp in her hometown in Kentucky. But the thing really took off after she joined the 9/12 movement and was able to go on television and promote her "camp for kids that's all about politics"...on Glenn Beck's Show. Lonesome Rhodes Beck -- he's probably less a hypocrite than he is a victim of severe brain damage -- today's Worst Person In The World.
I close, as promised, with a Special Comment on the debt deal.
Our government has now given up the concept of right and wrong.
We have, in this deal, declared that we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all political incumbents are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Re-nomination, re-election, and the pursuit of hypocrisy.
We have, in this deal, gone from the Four Freedoms to the Four Great Hypocrisies.
We have superceded Congress to facilitate 750 billion dollars in domestic cuts including Medicare in order to end an artificially-induced political hostage crisis over debt, originating from the bills run up by a Republican president who funneled billions of taxpayer dollars to the military-industrial complex by unfunded, unnecessary, and unproductive wars, enabled in doing so by the very same Republican leaders who now cry for balanced budgets - and we have called it compromise. And those who defend it have called it a credit to a pragmatic president who wins some sort of political "points" because, having stood for almost nothing here, he gave away almost nothing for which he stood.
It would be comical if it were not tragic.
Either way, it is a signal moment in our history, in which both parties have agreed and codified that the political structure of this nation shall now based entirely on hypocrisy and political self-perpetuation.
Let us start with the first of the Great Hypocrisies: The Committee. The Republican dogs can run back to their corporate masters and say they have forced one-and-one-half trillion dollars in cuts and palmed off the responsibility for them on this nonsensical "Super Congress" committee.
For two-and-a-half brutal years we have listened to these Tea Party mountebanks screech about the Constitution of the United States as if it were the revealed word and not the product of other - albeit far better - politicians. They demand the repeal of Amendments they don't like, and the strict interpretation of the ones they do, and the specific citation of authorization within the Constitution for every proposed act or expenditure or legislation.
Except this one.
Where does it say in the Constitution that the two houses of Congress can, in effect, create a third house to do its dirty work for it; to sacrifice a few Congressmen and Senators so the vast majority of incumbents can tell the voters they had nothing to do with this?
This leads to the second of the Great Hypocrisies: how, in the same breath, the Republicans can create an extra-Constitutional "Super Congress" and yet also demand a Constitutional Amendment to force the economic stupidity that would be a mandated balanced budget. Firstly: pick a side! Ignore the Constitution or adhere to it.
Firstly, pick a side, ignore the constitution or adhere to it. And of what value would this Mandated Balanced Budget be? Our own history proves that at a time of economic crisis, if the businesses aren't spending, and the consumers aren't spending, the government must. Our ancestors were the lab rats in the horrible experiments of the Hoover Administration that brought on the Great Depression, in which the government curled up into a ball while it simultaneously insisted the economy should heal itself, when, in times of crisis - then and now - the economy turns out to be comprised entirely of a bunch of rich people who will sit on their money no matter if the country starves.
Forgotten in the Republican Voodoo dance, dressed in the skins of the mythical Balanced Budget, triumphant over the severed head of short-term retrenchment that they can hold up to their moronic followers, are the long-term implications of the mandated Balanced Budget.
What happens if there's ever another... war?
Or another... terrorist attack?
Or another... natural disaster?
Or any other emergency that requires a government to spend a dollar more than it has? A Constitutional Amendment denying us the right to run a deficit, is madness, and it will be tested by catastrophe sooner than any of its authors with their under-developed imaginations that can count only contributions and votes, can contemplate.
And the third of the Great Hypocrisies is hidden inside the shell game that is the Super Congress. The Super Congress is supposed to cut evenly from domestic and defense spending, but if it cannot agree on those cuts, or Congress will not endorse them, there will be a "trigger" that automatically cuts a trillion-two or more - but those cuts will not necessarily come evenly from the Pentagon. We are presented with an agreement that seems to guarantee the gutting of every local sacred cow from the Defense Department. Except if the Congressmen and Senators to whom the cows are sacred, disagree, and overrule, or sabotage the Super Congress, or, except if for some reason a 12-member Committee split evenly along party lines can't manage to avoid finishing every damned vote 6-to-6.
We're cutting Defense. Unless we're not.
The fourth of the Great Hypocrisies is the evident agreement to not add any revenues to the process of cutting. Not only is the impetus to make human budget sacrifices out of the poor and dependent formalized... but the rich and the corporations are thus indemnified, again, and given more money not merely to spend on themselves and their own luxuries, but more vitally, they are given more money to spend on buying politicians, and legislatures, and courts, buying entire states, all of which can be directed like so many weapons, in the service of one cause and one cause alone: making by statute and ruling, the further protection of the wealthy at the expense of everybody else, untouchable, inviolable - permanent.
The White House today boasted of loopholes to be closed and tax breaks to be rescinded -- later.
By a committee.
A committee that has yet to be formed.
There are no new taxes. Except the stealth ones, enacted on 99 out of 100 Americans by this evil transaction. Every dollar cut from the Safety Net is another dollar added to the citizen's cost for education, for security, for health, for life itself. It is another dollar he can't spend on making a better life for himself, or at least his children. It is another dollar he must spend instead on simply keeping himself alive.
Where is the outrage over these Great Hypocrisies? Do you expect it to come from a corrupt and corrupted media, for whom access is of greater importance than criticizing the failure of a political party or defending those who don't buy newspapers or can't leap website paywalls or could not afford cable tv?
Do you expect it to come from a cynical and manipulative political structure? Do you expect it from those elected officials who no longer know anything of government or governance, but only perceive how to get elected, or how to pose in front of a camera and pretend to be leaders? Do you expect it from politicians themselves, who will merely calculate whether or not it's right based on whether or not it will get them more contributions?
Do you expect it will come from the great middle ground of this country, with a population obsessed with entertainment, video games, social media, sports, and trivia?
Where is the outrage to come from?
It will do no good to wait for the politicians to suddenly atone for their sins. They are too busy trying to keep their jobs, to do their jobs.
It will do no good to wait for the media to suddenly remember its origins as the 'free press,' the watchdog of democracy envisioned by Jefferson. They are too busy trying to get exclusive DETAILS about exactly how the bankrobbers emptied the public's pockets, to give a damn about telling anybody what they looked like, or which way they went.
It will do no good to wait for the apolitical public to get a clue. They can't hear the clue through all the chatter and scandal and diversion and delusion and illusion.
The betrayal of what this nation is supposed to be about did not begin with this deal and it surely will not end with this deal. There is a tide pushing back the rights of each of us, and it has been artificially induced by union-bashing and the sowing of hatreds and fears, and now this ever-more-institutionalized economic battering of the average American. It will continue, and it will crush us, because those who created it are organized and unified and hell-bent.
And the only response is to be organized and unified and hell-bent in return. We must find again the energy and the purpose of the 1960's and early 1970's and we must protest this deal and all the God damn deals to come, in the streets. We must arise, non-violently but insistently. General strikes, boycotts, protests, sit-ins, non-cooperation take-overs - but modern versions of that resistance, facilitated and amplified, by a weapon our predecessors did not have: the glory that is instantaneous communication.
It is from an old and almost clichéd motion picture that the wisdom comes: First, you've got to get mad.
I cannot say to you, meet here or there at this hour or that one, and we will peacefully break the back of government that now exists merely to get its functionaries re-elected. But I can say that the time is coming when the window for us to restore the control of our government to our selves will close, and we had damn well better act before then.
Because this deal is more than a tipping point in which the government goes from defending the safety net to gutting it. This is wrong, and while our government has now declared that it has given up the concept of right-and-wrong, you and I... have not, and will not, do so.
Good night, and good luck.